21. SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. canadian supreme court decisionsare made by people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns. http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id10.html

document.isTrellix = 1; Get Five DVDs for $.49 each. Join now. Tell me when this page is updated Home Canada - US Amalgamation ... HOW TO STOP WESTERN ALIENATION SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CANADIAN PARLIAMENT HOW TO FIX CANADA Francophonie Games The Value of the Canadian Dollar ... SPECIAL-INTEREST GROUPS FEEDBACK numberfour SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. Canadian Supreme Court decisions are made by people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns. SUPREME-COURT LAW Prime Minister Chretien and Pierre Trudeau wrote the Charter of Rights in 1982. They got the Queen to sign it no referendum, no discussion, no input from Canadians in general and extremely difficult to change. It allowed Supreme-Court-made law. The prime minister appointed all Supreme Court justices for life, until they reached 75 or die. Canadians were not allowed to question these appointees about hidden prejudices or vested interests. In 16 years the Supreme Court struck down 58 statutes 31 federal and 27 provincial according to their private interpretations of the Charter. This appointed-for-life Supreme Court neutered our elected parliaments by changing, canceling or remaking laws made in parliament. These were revolutionary changes homosexual marriages, kiddie porn, definition of spouse, Indians allowed to fish out of season etc. The Supreme Court not the federal government made federal policy. Therefore Canadians were denied democracy and were forced to accept these changes judicial dictatorship.

22. CANADIAN PARLIAMENT CANADA IS A JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP The canadian supreme court recently ruled thatCanada cannot extradite people without seeking assurances they will not face http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id12.html

document.isTrellix = 1; Get Five DVDs for $.49 each. Join now. Tell me when this page is updated Home Canada - US Amalgamation ... SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CANADIAN PARLIAMENT HOW TO FIX CANADA Francophonie Games The Value of the Canadian Dollar Ottawa Liberals and Pedophiles ... SPECIAL-INTEREST GROUPS FEEDBACK numberfour CANADIAN PARLIAMENT Prime Minister Chretien could be prime minister for the rest of his life. CANADIANS ARE UP AGAINST IT Canadians in the West know that their votes are almost meaningless in the present parliamentary set up. They can complain from dawn 'till dusk, seven days a week but nothing will change. The percentage of Canadians who even bother vote has steadily declined in recent years. The voters 40% of the 61% who bothered to vote decided and it's all over for another four years or until the prime minister decides. Chretien will also decide when the next election will be called because Canadians do not have a set date for elections. And he may run again because Canadians to not have term limits like the Americans. That is why ex-President Clinton could not run for president again. Chretien has won three elections as prime minister; he may try for three more. What's to stop him? He has a disciplined Liberal majority at his disposal. But it's even worse than that. Canadians as a whole do not elect him as prime minister; it's his fellow Liberals, the talking heads, trained seals and voting machine. There are no free votes in parliament. The Liberals vote as a block. It is not what their constituents want it is what Chretien wants. They owe him total loyalty or he may not sign their nomination papers at the next election or worse he might excommunicate them from the party as he did with Nunziata.

23. CWNews: New Canadian Supreme Court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance The story on this page is New canadian supreme court Justice Reveals ProHomosexualStance. New canadian supreme court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance http://www.cwnews.com/Browse/2002/08/18726.htm

Catholic World News is available for daily delivery by email and news stories may be browsed and searched online. For details, visit the Catholic World News web site New Canadian Supreme Court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance OTTAWA, Aug 12, 02 (LSN.ca/CWNews.com) - Newly appointed Canadian Supreme Court Justice Marie Deschamps has revealed she is in favor of special rights for homosexuals. The news comes as a serious blow to pro-family groups who note that the issue of homosexual marriage will undoubtedly reach the courts in the very near future. CBC reports that Deschamps said she's looking forward to dealing with the country's most important issues, including homosexuality. "This is a good example where society has evolved a lot," she said. "Ten years ago, many provinces did not have any law that would (have) recognized the equality of gays." Deschamps, a 49-year-old Quebec judge, is rumored to have been granted the prestigious appointment by Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien due to her husband's close ties to the Quebec Liberal party. The Toronto Star reports that Deschamp's husband Paul Gobeil was a cabinet minister in the government of Robert Bourassa and was also instrumental in Jean Charest's coronation as leader of the Quebec Liberal party in 1998. Currently Gobeil is the head of the Export Development Corporation, a federal crown agency. Canadian Alliance justice critic Vic Toews (Provencher) criticized the autocratic appointment of Supreme Court Justices by the Prime Minister. "I wish her (Deschamps) all the best in a difficult situation, but the danger of a closed process is that people will think she got the job because her husband is a prominent Liberal," he said. So far Chretien has appointed five judges to the Supreme Court.

24. CWNews: Canadian Supreme Court Judges Blast Christianity Church. The story on this page is canadian supreme court Judges Blast Christianity. CanadianSupreme Court Judges Blast Christianity OTTAWA http://www.cwnews.com/Browse/2000/11/14248.htm

Catholic World News is available for daily delivery by email and news stories may be browsed and searched online. For details, visit the Catholic World News web site Canadian Supreme Court Judges Blast Christianity OTTAWA, Nov, 14 (CWNews.com/LSN.ca) - In a court case that could lead to overt legal discrimination against Christians in Canada, two Supreme Court Justices blasted Christianity as discriminatory and intolerant. On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the case of Trinity Western University in which the British Columbia College of Teachers (BCCT) refuses to approve the teacher education program at Trinity Western because the Christian school's code of conduct requires students and teachers to refrain from homosexual sex as well other sinful actions. Two lower court decisions have ordered the BCCT to accredit the university's program, but the Supreme Court suspended those decisions by granting a hearing. During the hearing, Justice Claire L'Heureux-Dube, a feminist activist, was quoted in the National Post as saying, "We have all this love stuff, but if Trinity's code stated that blacks were inferior to whites, or that Jews should be killed, would its teachers still be fit for public schools?" And when the universities defenders said evidence of discrimination must be found among teachers who have graduated from the program, Judge Dube said, "Evidence [of discrimination] is in the [Trinity] program. What kind of other evidence do you want?" Dube is a known homosexual activist, having spoken at homosexual conferences in favor of legal recognition of same-sex marriage.

25. Canadian Supreme Court Ruling Impacts Personal Liability For Corporate Directors A recent canadian supreme court ruling, and two subsequent companion appeals, representa significant change in personal liability for corporate directors and http://www.meritas.org/FSL5CS/news/news391.asp

Canadian Supreme Court Ruling Impacts Personal Liability for Corporate Directors, Managers A recent Canadian Supreme Court ruling, and two subsequent companion appeals, represent a significant change in personal liability for corporate directors and senior management. David Debenham, BrazeauSeller (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; www.brazeauseller.com However, ADGA v. Valcom and two recent companion appeals have established a new general principle that directors, officers and senior managers are personally ADGA Doctrine Visit this link Members Benefits Marketing Toolkit Annual Meeting ... Return to Public Site

26. Canadian Supreme Court Allows Some Lap Dancing Gamelink Buy Movies and Streaming Video HERE! December 13, 1999 0554pm CanadianSupreme Court allows some lap dancing Source Reuters by Randall Palmer http://ainews.com/story/43/

Search AINews Front Page Adult Film News Adult Media News Business News ... Contact AINews More Stories From SilverCash Sponsors ASACP Las Vegas Dancers Alliance Files Initiative LV Dancers Take Off Gloves Action Alert From FSC - Filibuster! ... Supreme Court to Hear Web Porn Case December 13, 1999 05:54pm Canadian Supreme Court allows some lap dancing Source: Reuters by: Randall Palmer (OTTAWA) Canada's highest court has given lap dancing its seal of approval. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Monday that certain nude lap dancers did not violate community standards, despite an earlier judgment against the practice which involves paying for individual dances at strip bars. The court acquitted Therese Blais Pelletier, the co-owner of a strip bar, of keeping a bawdy house a place of sex for money despite the fact that erotic lap dances were being performed in an open cubicle for money. "The dancers were required to follow the appellant's (Pelletier's) rule against touching clients, but clients were allowed to touch the dancers' buttocks and breasts," according to a statement presented by the Supreme Court. The court heard the case on Monday and ordered an immediate 3-2 acquittal, with full reasons to follow months later.

27. EMailing The Story "Canadian Supreme Court Rules School Board Wrong To Ban Books You are emailing the story canadian supreme court rules school board wrongto ban books Who Are You Sending This To? Who Are You? Name Your Name http://www.lisnews.com/MailStory.php?sid=20030108202135

28. TIME.com: Canadian Supreme Court -- Dec. 27, 1999 Advanced Search. O T H E R S W H O S H A P E D 1 9 9 9 CanadianSupreme Court By STEPHEN HANDELMAN/OTTAWA. Monday, Dec. 27, 1999 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/intl/article/0,9171,1107991227-37398,00.html

PHOTO ESSAY On Assignment TIME photographers capture the battlefield Articles Since 1985 Current Issue Past 30 Days -Top Searches- Iraq George W. Bush U.S. Military al-Qaeda Osama bin Laden Advanced Search O T H E R S W H O S H A P E D 1 9 9 9 Canadian Supreme Court By STEPHEN HANDELMAN/OTTAWA Monday, Dec. 27, 1999 The Supreme Court of Canada sits in an austere, gray stone building above the Ottawa River, just down a slight hill from Parliament. But for most of 1999, the controversy swirling around the nine justices, led by Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, might have led an observer unschooled in Ottawa geography to think that the jurists held the higher ground and were steamrolling their vision of the country over the people's elected representatives. In some 60 decisions the court underlined as never before its role as the guardian of Canadian rights and freedoms-and occasionally, according to critics, as the radical interpreter and even inventor of those rights. The Court dominated the national agenda with rulings that extended the definition of secondary picketing, restricted doctor-patient confidentiality and expanded the right to be tried in either official language across the country. It delved into the most intimate aspects of citizens' lives with decisions on divorce and gay rights, and for the first time in its 124-year history, sparked interracial violence with one of its most controversial decisions, on East Coast aboriginal fishing rights. However they applauded or decried specific decisions, legal experts were generally agreed that the Lamer court had launched a new era of juridical activism, inspired by the 1982 Charter of Individual Rights and Freedoms. Chief Justice Lamer himself agrees. "Our decisions hit harder because they hit wider," said Lamer, 66, a former Quebec criminal defense lawyer who has led the court since 1990. Lamer, who is taking early retirement in January, was unapologetic. From his point of view, the issue was not court activism but political passivity. "The kinds of problems we've been getting are issues that 25 years ago went to Members of Parliament" he told TIME. "It's not for me or any judge to decide which laws should be passed, but if legislatures choose not to legislate, where else can people go except the courts?"

29. ClariNet - All The News You Can Use, Now! canadian supreme court rejects Harvard bid to patent life form. Thursday,05Dec-2002 1050AM PST, Story from AFP Copyright 2002 by http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/ca/Qcanada-us-genetics.Rmo0_CD5.ht

We're sorry, but this news story has expired from our online archives. If you were a ClariNet subscriber, you would have seen this story 10 minutes after it was published: Tell me more about ClariNet Individual News! ClariNet offers newsfeeds that provide compelling news on your website: to attract and retain customers, with a range of products to meet every need and budget. Join the thousands of sites that already use the most desired content on the Web. Tell me more about ClariNet Newsfeeds for my site! Home ... Help/Search

30. Politech: Canadian Supreme Court Recognizes Free Speech May Be A Good Idea Politech canadian supreme court recognizes free speech may be a goodidea From Declan McCullagh (declan_at_well.com) Date Feb http://lists.insecure.org/lists/politech/2002/Feb/0088.html

Nmap stealth port scanner Intro Download OS Detect ... Credits Politech: Canadian Supreme Court recognizes free speech may be a good idea From: Declan McCullagh ( declan_at_well.com Date: Feb 23 2002 Next message: Declan McCullagh: "ICANN CEO proposes radical changes, more government involvement" Previous message: Declan McCullagh: "Calif. federal court says it has no jurisdiction over Guantanamo" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ... [ attachment ] Here's a (long) URL to another article on the same topic: -Declan - Forwarded message from owner-politech_at_politechbot.com From: "Michael Gurstein" < mgurst_at_vcn.bc.ca To: "Politech_at_Politechbot. Com" < politech_at_politechbot.com Subject: FW: [CPI-UA]: Important free speech decision Supreme Court Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:24:31 -0500 I think this may be of interest to your readers. Mike Gurstein Michael Gurstein, Ph.D. (Visiting) Professor: School of Management New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ Consumer beefs part of free speech Supreme Court strikes down bylaw that barred sign denouncing company By KIRK MAKIN Friday, February 22, 2002 ­ Print Edition, Page A5

31. Politech 2002/02: FC: Canadian Supreme Court Recognizes Free Sp FC canadian supreme court recognizes free speech may be a good idea. FromDeclan McCullagh (declan@well.com) Date Sat Feb 23 2002 100235 PST. http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2002/02/0087.html

FC: Canadian Supreme Court recognizes free speech may be a good idea From: Declan McCullagh ( declan@well.com Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 10:02:35 PST Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: ICANN CEO proposes radical changes, more government involvement" Previous message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Calif. federal court says it has no jurisdiction over Guantanamo" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Here's a (long) URL to another article on the same topic: -Declan - Forwarded message from owner-politech@politechbot.com - From: "Michael Gurstein" < mgurst@vcn.bc.ca > To: "Politech@Politechbot. Com" < politech@politechbot.com http://www.mccullagh.org/ To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: ICANN CEO proposes radical changes, more government involvement" Previous message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Calif. federal court says it has no jurisdiction over Guantanamo" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 Sat Feb 23 2002 - 09:03:47 PST

32. Packing.org, The Concealed Carry Database Canadian Supreme All of Canada canadian supreme court backs gun control law. Postedon Monday, June 19, 2000 at 0845 AM by msolomon This June 15 http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/1758

33. Packing.org, The Concealed Carry Database Canadian Supreme All of Canada canadian supreme court Equivocates on Gun Registry.Posted on Saturday, June 17, 2000 at 0836 AM by spwenger The http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/1749

34. Georgetown University Grad School Welcomes Canadian Supreme Court Justice In Tal georgetown.edu. Georgetown University Grad School Welcomes Canadian SupremeCourt Justice in Talk about Waging War Lawfully WHO Louise http://communications.georgetown.edu/media_advisories/2003/02/ma03.htm

Media Advisory February 3, 2003 Contact: Vickie Jones vlj2@georgetown.edu Georgetown University Grad School Welcomes Canadian Supreme Court Justice in Talk about Waging War Lawfully WHO: Louise Arbour, Supreme Court Justice of Canada Justice Arbour served as the Chief Prosecutor of War Crimes before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. While at this post, she indicted Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic, the first time a sitting head of state was indicted by an international tribunal. Justice Arbour held earlier appointments on the Supreme Court of Ontario and the Court of Appeal. WHAT: Georgetown University Graduate School Distinguished Lecturer Series Arbour's lecture is titled "Waging War Lawfully: Who will enforce the law?" in which she will explore the relationship between international and domestic prosecutions for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Arbour posits that the International Criminal Court may be an entirely successful international judicial institution even if it never hears a case. WHEN: Wednesday, February 5, 2003

35. Canadian Bishops On Supreme Court Abortion Decision (January 28, 1988) Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January1988 following the announcement of a canadian supreme court decision on http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/hayes88-01-28canada.htm

January 1988 President of Canadian Episcopal Conference on Supreme Court decision on abortion Archbishop James Hayes, president of the Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January 1988 following the announcement of a Canadian Supreme Court decision on abortion laws. The Supreme Court decision striking down the abortion law is a dramatic challenge to all lay members of the Church and to all of us their pastors. The need for responsible political action was never more urgent. For God's law condemning abortion is not changed by the Supreme Court decision. In the process of writing a new law that protects human life from conception, lay Christians as voters and legislators have the first responsibility. The situation of "abortion on demand" that follows from the Court's decision must be corrected legislatively as soon as possible. This is our common task now, and the future of our human society depends on how soon and how well it is done. In the process of working for new legislation, all Christians must also apply themselves to the continuing pastoral work of evangelizing modern culture regarding the God-given values and rights of every human life, and the need to safeguard and respect that life in all circumstances. Abortion is the destruction of human life. The challenge is to change our society's attitude towards life and to channel the energies and strong emotions involved in this debate towards correcting mentalities and situations that lead to abortion. We need to create a society that supports life and enables children to be raised with dignity; a society that puts other people's rights and needs ahead of personal comfort and gain; a society that respects human life at every stage of its development.

36. 1713. Canadian Supreme Court. Simpson’s Contemporary Quotations. 1988 1988. NUMBER 1713. AUTHOR canadian supreme court. QUOTATION Kneelingto receive Communion is not a criminal offense. ATTRIBUTION http://www.bartleby.com/63/13/1713.html

Select Search All Bartleby.com All Reference Columbia Encyclopedia World History Encyclopedia World Factbook Columbia Gazetteer American Heritage Coll. Dictionary Roget's Thesauri Roget's II: Thesaurus Roget's Int'l Thesaurus Quotations Bartlett's Quotations Columbia Quotations Simpson's Quotations English Usage Modern Usage American English Fowler's King's English Strunk's Style Mencken's Language Cambridge History The King James Bible Oxford Shakespeare Gray's Anatomy Farmer's Cookbook Post's Etiquette Bulfinch's Mythology Frazer's Golden Bough All Verse Anthologies Dickinson, E. Eliot, T.S. Frost, R. Hopkins, G.M. Keats, J. Lawrence, D.H. Masters, E.L. Sandburg, C. Sassoon, S. Whitman, W. Wordsworth, W. Yeats, W.B. All Nonfiction Harvard Classics American Essays Einstein's Relativity Grant, U.S. Roosevelt, T. Wells's History Presidential Inaugurals All Fiction Shelf of Fiction Ghost Stories Short Stories Shaw, G.B. Stein, G. Stevenson, R.L. Wells, H.G. Reference Quotations PREVIOUS NEXT ... BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD NUMBER: AUTHOR: Canadian Supreme Court QUOTATION: Kneeling to receive Communion is not a criminal offense.

37. Clark University His examination of the canadian supreme court and the European Union'sCourt of Justice shows they are likewise flexing their muscles. http://www.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerD.shtml

Judicial Activism: Discover! Judicial Activism: In Depth Interview with Dr. Miller Interview with Dan Bresette Learn More! European Union homepage European Court of Justice homepage ... Help Clark University 950 Main Street Worcester, MA 01610 Privacy Policy Home > Judicial Activism 40 percent of undergraduates volunteer in the community. Professor Mark Miller Countries under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Provinces and Territories of Canada. Click to enlarge. European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Canadian Supreme Court building in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Click to enlarge. Photo Supreme Court of Canada. Photographer: Philippe Landreville Photograph Inc. Discover! Courting controversy: the evolving activism of high courts Chads and recounts from last November's election aside, the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the only high court flexing its muscles. For Professor Mark Miller and advisee Dan Bresette '01, following the activities of courts and congresses is a favorite pastime. While Bresette researches Congress's role in foreign policy during the Clinton years, Miller has been attending to the role of high courts in making policy.

38. Clark University The question remains, will the European Court of Justice be a unifyingfactor like the US and canadian supreme courts or will it different? http://www.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerInt.shtml

Judicial Activism: Discover! Judicial Activism: In Depth Interview with Dr. Miller Interview with Dan Bresette Learn More! European Union homepage European Court of Justice homepage ... Help Clark University 950 Main Street Worcester, MA 01610 Privacy Policy Home > Judicial Activism 40 percent of undergraduates volunteer in the community. To see a video clip, click on your preferred video player: QuickTime (biggest but best!) Real Player Windows Media . To download any of this software, click here Meet the researchers: Justice across continents After spending 1999 as a Judicial Fellow for Chief Justice William Rehnquist at the U.S. Supreme Court, government professor Mark Miller knows how the U.S. courts work first-hand. But he is also fascinated by the relationship between the Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress as well as how our court system, overall, compares to others around the world. In a recent interview, Miller discusses his current research in: comparative court systems,

39. WHAT IS EUTHANASIA Borowski (1989 canadian supreme court). Tremblay v. Daigle (1987 QuebecCourt of Appeal). Tremblay v. Daigle (1989 canadian supreme court). http://www.thunderbayrighttolife.com/abortion-homepage.htm

THUNDER BAY RIGHT TO LIFE home page: ABORTION home page THE ETHICS OF ABORTION Dr.Irving, On Personhood Dr. Stephen Swatz, The Morality of Abortion Dr. J.C. Wilke, Abortion: Questions and Answers FETAL DEVELOPMENT (PICTURES ANDTEXT) Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, Human Development from Conception to Birth Sound Wave Images Inc., A Window on the Womb American Collegians for Life, Fetal Development Canadian Pregnacy Counselling, Fetal Development Overview Parents Place.com, First Nine Months Conscience Laws, When Does Human Life Begin? Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Stages of Life - Lennart Nilsson photos Miracle of Life - Lennart Nilsson photos here Nova On-Line, Life’s Greatest Miracle Nova On-Line, Order Form for Life’s Greatest Miracle Pro-Hosting.com, The Journey of an Unborn Child Dr. DeVore, Ultrasound by Dr. De Vore Dr. Woo, Ultrasound by Dr. Joseph Woo Wisconsin Right to Life, Heartbeat on an Unborn Baby- 8 weeks METHODS OF ABORTION National Right to Life, Suction Abortion National Right to Life, The RU-486 Files

40. WHAT IS EUTHANASIA Rv Latimer (1995 canadian supreme court). Rv Rodriquez (1997 CanadianSupreme Court). Rv Latimer (1997 canadian supreme court). Rv http://www.thunderbayrighttolife.com/euthanasia-homepage.htm

THUNDER BAY RIGHT TO LIFE home page EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE home page THE ETHICS OF EUTHANASIA Robert Sutherland, The Ethics of Euthanasia 01. Introduction 02. The Definition of Euthanasia 03. The Law on Euthanasia 04. The Mechanics of Euthanasia 05. The Morality: The Right to Life 06. The Morality: The Right to Liberty 07. Euthanasia Safeguards: Voluntary Request 08. Euthanasia Safeguards: Terminal Illness 09. Euthanasia Safeguards: Unbearable Pain 10. If it were legalized, how many people would die? 11. Recommended books, videos and bookstores EUTHANASIA SAFEGUARDS: VOLUNTARY REQUEST Congressional Testimony of Dr.Herbert Hendrin EUTHANASIA SAFEGUARDS: UNBEARABLE PAIN Congressional Testimony of Dr. Kathleen Foley Power over Pain: How to Get the Pain Control You Need THE MECHANICS OF EUTHANASIA Kevorkian’s Suicide Machine - click on Assisted Suicide Methods Royal Dutch Society for the Advancement of Pharmacy, Administration and Compounding of Euthanasic Agents International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force, Euthanasia as Practised in the Netherlands International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 2     21-40 of 104    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20