Customer Reviews (22)
Not for multiple-deck owners.
This deck *requires* you know your mythology, your Celtic sagas (no, I do not mean the Eddas or the Finnish saga).You must know them, you must know Celtci culture as the wide- sweeping thing it is and was--and you must know very little of it will be reflected in this deck.
I dislike decks with "extra cards".The standard number is quite enough to learn/interpret/be inspired by.I am a purist in this:if you add cards besides the Major Arcana, the Court Cards, and the rest of the Minor Arcana, what you have is NOT A TAROT DECK!You may indeed have an *oracle*, but not all oracle cards are Tarot cards.
If you do not know your mythology, you will be confused by the namings of the cards--the cards have names beyond court and suit, and these names have significance.If you don't know them, you miss out on part of the meaning.
I've heard from the more scholarly inclined that the Gaelic used in the deck is awful, the Ogham is applied with little to no purpose (the equivalent would be just slapping in Futhark runes whereever they look good), and that some of her mythological comparisons are questionable at best.
I can only tell you I found it annoying to continually reference the book--and I'm not a novice reader--to work around these 'extra cards' that always required reference.If you are an experienced reader of more traditional Tarot, or even the more expansive, wide-ranging decks, I still think you will have trouble with this.It's not just mythology, it's the creator's *interpretation* of the mythology that must be learned, and I find that... cultish thinking.
I *like* rather strange art, so the visuals did not bother me (the reason for the two stars).The book (badly organized, and due to its micro-size, containing no index, with small print, difficult to handle) gives a strong impression that this is a 'channeled work'.I have little opinion on that--but I know this isn't Feri as I know it, it's barely Wicca, and it's certainly not Tarot.
Very well done book and deck
Now, I freely admit my work with spiritual anything is rather limited. I became interested in it when I was working as a clerk in a New Age shop in Maine. There was a reader who worked there, and something she told me stuck with me when I was looking for a deck to initiate myself into Tarot. No matter if the deck is made by US Game Systems, which has a tradition of pumping out Tarot decks by the tons, or is done individually, it's no good if you don't feel a pull to and connection with the deck. This particular deck struck a chord with me, mostly because I'm Irish-American, and I thought the artwork was amazing. The artwork is really what first drew me, since I didn't recognize Emer on the cover. It's strong, clear, and uncluttered. Ms. Stepanich's writing is very much the same. The slight renaming and of some traditional aspects, like renaming Page, Knight, Queen, King as Knight,Maiden, High King and High Queen can be confusing or off-putting to some, but I feel that's more a matter of personal taste.
I can happily say I've got no reservations recommending this set to anyone interested in the mythological history of Ireland. Is it completely accurate? No. Is that a problem? Well, that depends on how you respond to such things. People will always have their own opinions, and some do more fact checking the others. If you take everything you read on faith, that's more a failing on oneself, then the writer. If you discover an INTEREST in the topic, and collect your OWN data, then there's nothing horribly wrong with one person being wrong, or mistaken, about some historical facts. Those facts are written by the winners, anyways. However, this deck will hopefully guide the interested reader into doing their own research, something one should do anyways. And more importantly, Kisma, in my opinion, does a very good job on displaying the importance of being open minded and willing to stretch your thinking and find more information on your own, without immediately telling everyone who believes something different than you, that they are "wrong!". And again...if you feel a connection to the deck, then even if the details of the history of Mannan Mac Lir are wrong, your interpertation will be fine, without anyone else's help.
Ignore the detractors, and give the deck a try. It all comes down to that connection, and either it's there or its not, but you won't know until you work with it.
Try it
Let me start out by saying that this deck has beautiful artwork which does resonate with me on one level. Thought i am not wiccanI bought these cards and Kismas other 2 Faery books and am glad to have them. Kisma has been accused of being false in her presentation but I just dont see it. Kisma Stepanich has presented a very in depth journey in these cards, she has opened the doors to higher consciousness and I reccomend people who are drawn to it most assuredly try it. Good luck on your journey.
I liked it! I don't care what anyone else thinks.
I never really used any other cards but these (I've owned a Rider-Waite deck I didn't resonate with), and I still think these are useful and insightful. I don't find the deck too complicated as some say, but then I am not attempting any spreads, just one card readings that usually give the answer my heart peacefully acknowledges as truth. Another reviewer stated that the cardshave "spot-on accuracy" and are of a "revelation nature", and I find this description accurate with regards to my own experience.
I've read the reviews of others on this site, and I'm certainly not closed-minded to the idea that perhaps the "lore" is inaccurate...but I'm glad I never knew of the possibility till after I used and loved the deck! It is a deck worth knowing, for me. Also, if I had read the reviews before I bought it, I wouldn't have bought it, because I'm quite anal about the accuracy of things. The deck has been intensely insightful for me, personally, so I can easily forgive any potential inaccuracies or made-up histories. Besides, I'd be interested to see if this other reviewer (who said "to claim it isn't correct by their knowledge is at best being a fundamentalist in a very unfundamentalist religion") might not have a point. Also, I have to consider this: I personally refuse to subscribe to any path in a fundamentalist fashion; I pick the aspects of each "religion" or "path" that are right for me and they are amalgamated into my daily life. If I were to personally write a spiritually inspired book or anything else, it would most likely be a work of "cobbled together stuff", those elements from varying sources that fit into my mind and heart like puzzle pieces, even if they didn't come from paths with identical "titles". Maybe that's what the author of this tarot deck was doing, (if the negative reviewers happen to be right!) who knows. I like the deck, dang it.
My favourite Deck!
This was a present and it has become my main deck. Perhaps people whom don't like it don't like celts either.It's very well thought out and the more you study it, the deeper it gets. The art work is gorgeous and thesymbolism brilliant.
... Read more
|