Home  - Scientists - Lakatos Imre

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

21-40 of 90    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Lakatos Imre:     more books (50)

Escritos Filosoficos/ Philosophical Writtings: Matematicas, Ciencia Y Epistemologia by Imre Lakatos, 2007-02-28 Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, volume 4. by Imre, & Alan MUSGRAVE, (editors). LAKATOS, 1970 Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. by Imre Lakatos, 1967 Problem of Inductive Logic by Imre Lakatos, 1968 THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTIVE LOGIC. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Volume 2. A Volume in the Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics Series. by Imre. (Editor) LAKATOS, 1968 Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. by Imre Lakatos, 1968 Escritos Filosoficos/ Philosophical Writtings: La Metodologia De Los Programas De Investigacion Cientifica by Imre Lakatos, 2007-02-28 Lakatos: An Introduction by Brendan Larvor, 1998-03-19 Kritik und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Kuhns, Lakatos' und Feyerabends Kritik des kritischen Rationalismus (Die Einheit der Gesellschaftswissenschaften) by Gunnar Andersson, 1988 Criticism and the History of Science: Kuhn'S, Lakatos's and Feyerabend's Criticisms of Critical Rationalism (Philosophy of History and Culture) by Gunnar Andersson, 1994-07 Lakatos' Philosophy of Mathematics (Studies in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics) by T. Koetsier, 1991-11-01 Probability Theory and Applications: Essays to the Memory of József Mogyoródi (Mathematics and Its Applications) Lakatos Imre tudomanyfilozofiai irasai (Kisertesek) by Imre Lakatos, 1997 A critique of Imre Lakatos' theory of scientific rationality by George Patrick Derr, 1976

lists with details

21. Imre Lakatos
    Imre Lakatos , a native of Hungary, was a victim if Nazi persecution who subsequentlyspent three years in jail during the era of Stalinist repression.  
    http://www.liv.ac.uk/~pcknox/teaching/phil/lakatos.htm
    
    Extractions: Home Staff Research Teaching ... Links Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) Imre Lakatos , a native of Hungary, was a victim if Nazi persecution who subsequently spent three years in jail during the era of Stalinist repression. In 1956 he left Hungary for England where he pursued investigations in philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of science at Cambridge and the London School of Economics. Use "Back" or "Refresh" keys or return to Index Home Staff Research ... Links

22. Imre Lakatos
    Imre Lakatos (19221974). Drawing by S. Uchii. Lastmodified November 19, 2002. suchii@bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp.  
    http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/phisci/Gallery/lakatos.html

23. Imre Lakatos
    Imre Lakatos. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific ResearchProgrammes. A Methodology Of Scientufic Research Programmers.  
    http://nb.vse.cz/~sloukova/FIL418/lakatos.htm
    
    Extractions: I have discussed the problem of objective appraisal of scientific growth in terms of progressive and degenerating problemshifts in series of scientific theories. The most important such series in the growth of science are characterized by a certain continuity which connects their members. This continuity evolves from a genuine research programme adumbrated at the start. The programme consists of methodological rules: some tell us what paths of research to avoid (negative heuristic), and others what paths to pursue (positive heuristic).1 Even science as a whole can be regarded as a huge research programme with Popper's supreme heuristic rule : "devise conjectures which have more empirical content than their predecessors." Such methodological rules may be formulated, as Popper pointed out, as metaphysical principles.2 For instance, the universal anti-conventiolnalist rule against exception-barring may be stated as the metaphysical principle: "Nature does not allow exceptions". This is why Watkins called such rules "influential metaphysics".3 But what I have primarily in mind is not science as a whole, but rather particular research programmes, such as the one known as "Cartesian metaphysics". Cartesian metaphysics, that is, the mechanistic theory of the universe-according to which the universe is a huge clockwork (and system of vortices) with push as the only cause of motion-functioned as a powerful heuristic principle. It discouraged work on scientific theories - like (the "essentialist" version of) Newton's theory of action at a distanee-which were inconsistent with it (negative heuristic). On the other hand, it encouraged work on auxiliary hypotheses which might have saved it from apparent counterevidence -like Keplerian ellipses (positive heuristic).4

24. Replika 23/24
    2324. szám Racionális-ea tudomány? Forrai Gábor lakatos imre tudományfilozófiájavázlat. Kiss Olga lakatos imre matematikafilozófiája.  
    http://www.replika.c3.hu/2324/00tart.htm

25. TudFil20
    az említetteken kívül olyan, mára már klasszikusokká vált szerzôk fô mûveiegészítik ki, mint Rudolf Carnap, Thomas Kuhn, lakatos imre és Polányi  
    http://osiris.elte.hu/~aron/tudfil20.htm

26. IMRE LAKATOS
    IMRE LAKATOS. THE METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES (MRP). Lakatos’soriginal intention was to defend Popper’s position by arguing  
    http://www.shef.ac.uk/~phil/courses/312/05lakatos.htm
    
    Extractions: IMRE LAKATOS THE METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES (MRP) Lakatos’s original intention was to defend Popper’s position by arguing that while a naive falsificationism might be objectionable because it depended too much upon the existence of crucial experiments and decisive refutations , there was still much to be said in favour of a ‘sophisticated falsificationism’. However, Lakatos seems to have come to realise that what he was advocating was more than just an amendment to Popper’s position, but was a genuinely independent methodological stance. Hence ‘Sophisticated Falsificationism’ became the Methodology of Research Programmes One might well view Lakatos’s MRP as a synthesis of what was acceptable in Popper and Kuhn. His main point is that, contrary to ‘naive falsificationism’ (i.e., Popper), theories of a certain sort — the sort that are cores of research programmes — are not sharply falsifiable. They can be cumulatively disconfirmed over a period of time, but they can't be decisively knocked out by a single crucial experiment This point is charmingly illustrated by the ‘imaginary case of planetary misbehaviour’ which Lakatos recounts in ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’. But in truth we should not need a detour through case-studies, real or imaginary, in order to grasp this point — which is

27. Kennis, Letteren & Maatschappij II, Imre Lakatos
    Imre Lakatos Lakatos neemt zich de kritiek van Kuhn op de Popperiaansevoor onderstelling van wetenschappelijke vooruitgang ter  
    http://www.sg.uu.nl/KLM/Lakatos.html
    
    Extractions: Lakatos neemt zich de kritiek van Kuhn op de Popperiaanse voor onderstelling van wetenschappelijke vooruitgang ter harte, maar is niet bereid om afstand te doen van de methodologie als sturend principe van wetenschappelijke activiteit. Hij geeft, met zijn verfijnd falsificationisme , manieren aan om om te gaan met weerleggingen op een manier die nog steeds vooruitgang geeft. Volgens Lakatos staan generalisaties en beweringen nooit op zichzelf, maar zijn ze altijd verankerd in een onderzoekprogramma harde kern Daaromheen bevindt zich een beschermgordel van waarnemingsuitspraken en hulphypothesen waarin veranderingen kunnen worden aangebracht, die, als ze niet ad hoc zijn, een verbetering van de theorie opleveren. De methodologische regels, positieve en negatieve heuristiek Het onderzoek binnen een onderzoekprogramma wordt verondersteld theoretische progressie op te leveren. Wetenschappelijke voor uitgang wordt dus niet bepaald door een toenemende empirische inhoud, zoals in het geval van de logisch empiristen, of een toenemende informatieve waarde, zoals in het geval van het falsificationistische programma van Popper; vooruitgang houdt in een toenemende voorspellende waarde. Een theorie is een waardig opvolger van de vorige theorie in het onderzoekprogramma wanneer ze alles wat de eerste theorie kon verklaren of voorspelde omvat, en bovendien voorspellingen doet die volgens de eerste theorie onvoorstelbaar zijn. In tegenstelling tot Kuhn gaat Lakatos er van uit dat er een rationele keuze tussen verschillende programma's gemaakt kan worden op grond van (min of meer) duidelijke beslisregels, terwijl de paradigmawisselingen van Kuhn een tamelijk autonoom proces is waarop geen controle uit te oefenen valt. Precieze besluitvormingscriteria voor de keuze tussen onderzoeksprogramma's heeft Lakatos echter nooit geformuleerd.

28. Imre Lakatos
    Imre Lakatos. took up critical rationalism and modified it 12. Popper'sstrict disapproval of induction was weakened in order to  
    http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/CHD/staff_stu/cbe/mnvit/mnvit12/node6.html
    
    Extractions: took up critical rationalism and modified it [ ]. Popper's strict disapproval of induction was weakened in order to explain the success of induction in theoretical sciences [ ]. Furthermore Lakatos introduced the view of competing scientific programmes, which adhere to differing theories. These programmes develop in different directions but they can influence each other and although it sometimes seems that one of the theories is refuted it might be revived at a later point of time, when new evidence has accumulated. An example for this is the change from Aristarchos theory of the motion of the earth toward Ptolemaius view and back to Copernicus. The reason for these revivals might be an aspect of Popper's deductive method: the criteria that decide whether a hypothesis is refuted or not are building on metaphysical conjectures. Popper himself agrees that a final proof or disproof is not possible in nature. This point of Popper's theory has been attacked as irrational by Hilary Putnam among others [

29. BpN. 3. 1994/1 - Szász Imre: Ménesi Út (regényrészlet)
    ( ) lakatos imre a Révaieloadás után georgeizmussal vádolta Gyetvayékatés a kollégium szeniorját, a lassú beszédu Major Jenot, Révaival  
    http://www.bparchiv.hu/magyar/kiadvany/bpn/03/szasz.htm
    
    Extractions: Keresztury óráira nem emlékszem jól, gondolta Forrai; talán keveset is tanított; milyen jól emlékszem viszont a figyelõ Keresztury kicsit félrehajtott fejére, a homlokába biccent hajra, a magyarázó Keresztury kezére, amely a magyarázat hevében összerázódó, kinyíló ujjakkal úgy gyúrta a levegõt, mint fazekas az agyagot; az esti sétákra vele a Ménesi úton, amelyek mindig érdekesek voltak, de igazán melegek soha.

30. Imre Lakatos - Acapedia - Free Knowledge, For All
    Friends of Acapedia Imre Lakatos. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Imre Lakatos (19221974) was a philosopher of mathematics.  
    http://acapedia.org/aca/Imre_Lakatos

31. Atlantisz Alapítvány És Könyvkiadó - Budapest
    lakatos imre Tudományfilozófiai írásai 1997. lakatos imre (19221974)századunk egyik legkiemelkedobb tudományfilozófusa.  
    http://www.atlantiszkiado.hu/konyvek/lakatos_i_tud_fil_tan.htm
    
    Extractions: 1997. (Kísértések sorozat) Ford. Benedek András, Forrai Gábor. Bolti ár: 1295 Ft / Kiadón keresztül: 1036 Ft A legfontosabb elméletek megcáfoltan jönnek a világra... Lakatos Imre (1922-1974) századunk egyik legkiemelkedõbb tudományfilozófusa. Karl Popper kritikus tanítványa volt, az anarchista Feyerabend szerint a racionalizmus utolsó nagyformátumú védelmezõje.

32. Fizikai Szemle 2002/4
    Erdos Pál, Farkas Adalbert, Farkas László, Gábor Dénes, Harsányi János, HevesyGyörgy, Kármán Tódor, Kürti Miklós, lakatos imre, Lánczos Kornél  
    http://www.kfki.hu/fszemle/archivum/fsz0204/pallo0204.html
    
    Extractions: MTA Filozófiai Intézete A magyar jelenség a 19. század vége óta megfigyelhetõ tudománytörténeti folyamat, mely alapjaiban érinti az egész magyar tudományosságot. Egyik legfõbb jellegzetessége a tudóstehetségek 20. századi elvándorlása. Ez a folyamat szorosan kötõdik a tudomány és állam nem éppen viszálymentes kapcsolatához szinte az egész mögöttünk maradt évszázadban. A tudósok - és egyáltalán az értelmiségiek - elvándorlása a század során egyre fokozódó ütemben zajlott. A Magyarországról már végleg elköltözöttek teljes számát még megbecsülni sem tudjuk, hiszen olyan sokféle szakterületen, olyan különbözõ színvonalat elért kutatók olyan sok országba és olyan hosszú ideje vándorolnak, hogy sorsukat, teljesítményeiket csak igen pontatlanul tudjuk felmérni, megbecsülni. Elkülöníthetõ azonban egy alcsoport a vándorló tudósok nagy és rétegezett csoportján belül: a világhírû, lassanként legendává nemesülõ nagy tudósoké, akik a tudomány elitjébe kerültek, sõt némelyikük a tudomány sztárjává vált, ha egyáltalán értelmes dolog sztárokról beszélni a tudomány esetén. Minden esetre az általuk alkotott csoport sorsa, szerepe, eredményessége önálló, tanulmányozásra érdemes tudománytörténeti jelenség, mégpedig nem csak a magyar, hanem a 20. századi egyetemes tudománytörténet számára is, ezért neveztem el, Thomas Kuhnt követve, "magyar jelenségnek".

33. A Magyar Jelenség
    Erdõs Pál, Farkas Adalbert, Farkas László, Gábor Dénes, Harsányi János, HevesyGyörgy, Kármán Tódor, Kürti Miklós, lakatos imre, Lánczos Kornél  
    http://www.kfki.hu/~cheminfo/osztaly/kemia/pallo.html

34. Philosophische Schriften 2 Bde Bd1 Die Methodologie Der Wissenschaftlichen Forsc
    Translate this page Philosophische Schriften 2 Bde Bd1 Die Methodologie der wissenschaftlichenForschungsprogramme lakatos imre. Autor lakatos imre.  
    http://www.easybuchdirekt.de/Lakatos-Imre-Philosophische-Schriften-3528084294.ht

35. Citations: Proofs And Refutations - Lakatos (ResearchIndex)
    the . lakatos imre Proofs and Refutations . Cambridge University Press.1976. creative . Lakatos, Imre. (1976). Proofs and Refutations, CUP.  
    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/context/64305/0
    
    Extractions: This paper is cited in the following contexts: THE COPYCAT PROJECT: An Experiment in Nondeterminism and.. - Hofstadter (1984) (8 citations) (Correct) ....it even forces a re examination of the grounds for the original rule, The following series of targets is critical to our report, in that it demonstrates the enormous range of pressures that unanticipated targets can provide. In some ways it parallels the escalating series of monsters given by Lakatos in his work Proofs and Refutations (Lakatos) revealing how the formal notions proposed by mathematicians always fall short of the full richness of internal imagery and intuitions. Here, we show how any prior certainty about what the rule must be is easily violated or 8 cast in doubt by some .... ....for the original rule, The following series of targets is critical to our report, in that it demonstrates the enormous range of pressures that unanticipated targets can provide. In some ways it parallels the escalating series of monsters given by Lakatos in his work Proofs and Refutations ( Lakatos ) revealing how the formal notions proposed by mathematicians always fall short of the full richness of internal imagery and intuitions.

36. Hippias: Limited Area Search Of Philosophy On The Internet
    There were 49 matches to your query `Imre Lakatos' Matches 1 through 25 followlakatos imre Lakatos Born 9 Nov 1922 in Hungary Died 2 Feb 1974 in London  
    http://hippias.evansville.edu/search.cgi?Imre Lakatos

37. Free Essays On IMRE LAKATOS
    IMRE LAKATOS For the majority of his philosophical career, Lakatos was afollower of Popper. Category Religion. Word Count 536. IMRE LAKATOS.  
    http://www.freeforessays.com/show_essay/15555.html

38. Lakatos, Imre: For And Against Method
    lakatos, imre For and Against Method, university press books, shopping cart, new release notification  
    http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/13766.ctl
    
    Extractions: Paper $20.00tx 0-226-46775-9 Fall 2000 The work that helped to determine Paul Feyerabend's fame and notoriety, Against Method, stemmed from Imre Lakatos's challenge: "In 1970 Imre cornered me at a party. 'Paul,' he said, 'you have such strange ideas. Why don't you write them down? I shall write a reply, we publish the whole thing and I promise youwe shall have a lot of fun.' " Although Lakatos died before he could write his reply, For and Against Method reconstructs his original counter-arguments from lectures and correspondence previously unpublished in English, allowing us to enjoy the "fun" two of this century's most eminent philosophers had, matching their wits and ideas on the subject of the scientific method. For and Against Method opens with an imaginary dialogue between Lakatos and Feyerabend, which Matteo Motterlini has constructed, based on their published works, to synthesize their positions and arguments. Part one presents the transcripts of the last lectures on method that Lakatos delivered. Part two, Feyerabend's response, consists of a previously published essay on anarchism, which began the attack on Lakatos's position that Feyerabend later continued in

39. Proofs And Refutations - Imre Lakatos
    A review and a link to other reviews of Proofs and Refutations by imre lakatos.  
    http://www.complete-review.com/reviews/lakatosi/pandr.htm
    
    Extractions: Opinions "Lakatos's contribution to the philosophy of mathematics was, to put it simply, definitive: the subject will never be the same again. (...) Lakatos made us think instead about what most research mathematicians do. He wrote an amazing philosophical dialogue around the proof of a seemingly elementary but astonishingly deep geometrical idea pioneered by Euler. It is a work of art - I rank it right up there with the dialogues composed by Hume or Berkeley or Plato. He made us see a theorem, a mathematical fact, coming into being before our eyes." - Ian Hacking, in a review of

40. Lakatos
    Biography of imre lakatos (19221974) imre lakatos. Born 9 Nov 1922 in Hungary  
    http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Lakatos.html
    
    Extractions: Imre Lakatos was given the name Imre Lipschitz at birth, born into a Jewish family as his name clearly indicated. His life would be dominated by the chaos that resulted from the Nazi rise to power and World War II, the war breaking out when Imre was in his final years at school. It was a difficult period for Hungary, with the country unsure whether to side with Hitler or with the allies, but in many ways Hungary had few options. Hitler decided that he could not leave his vital communications at the mercy of an uncommitted Hungarian regime. In March 1944 Hitler offered Hungary the choice of either cooperating with Germany or the German armies would occupy the country. Hungary chose cooperation and appointed a government to collaborate with Hitler. The Germans did as they pleased, suppressing opponents and arresting anyone who spoke out against them. Jews were compelled to wear a yellow star and their property was taken away. Imre had spent the war years at the University of Debrecen and he graduated in 1944 with a degree in mathematics, physics and philosophy. To avoid the Nazi persecution of Jews he changed his name to

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

21-40 of 90    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20