Home  - Philosophers - Patocka Jan

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

61-80 of 90    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Patocka Jan:     more books (51)

Die Raupen und Puppen der Eichenschmetterlinge Mitteleuropas (Monographien zur angewandten Entomologie) by Jan Patocka, 1980 Ketzerische Essays zur Philosophie der Geschichte und ergänzende Schriften. by Jan Patocka, 1988-01-01 Vom Erscheinen als solchem: Texte aus dem Nachlass (Orbis Phaenomenologicus) by Jan Patocka, 2000 Masaryk, Salda, Patocka by Frantisek Kautman, 1990 L'écrivain, son "objet" by Jan Patocka, 1992-02-19 An Introduction to Husserl's Phenomenology.: An article from: The Review of Metaphysics by George E.A. Williamson, 1998-03-01 Body, Community, Language, World.(Review): An article from: The Review of Metaphysics by Brian Hansford Bowles, 1999-09-01 Ceske mysleni (Studie a prameny k dejinam mysleni v ceskych zemich) by Miloslav Bednar, 1996 Krize eschatologie neosobnosti (Rozmluvy) by Vaclav Belohradsky, 1982

lists with details

61. Jan Bøezina
    Ve studii In margine filosofie JL Fischera obhajuje Fischerovu filozofii proti nekterymnamitkam, jez proti ni formuloval jan patocka, a ukazuje JL Fischera  
    http://www.phil.muni.cz/fil/scf/brez.html
    
    Extractions: Po absolvování Opletalova státního gymnázia v Litovli (1949) studoval v l. 1949–53 na FF v Olomouci filozofii a èeštinu; v r. 1953 získal titul PhDr. V l. 1953–70 pùsobil jako støedoškolský profesor v Unièovì (v 60. l. jako øeditel tehdejší SVVŠ), v l. 1970–90 ve Šternberku. Od konce 50. let pøednášel externì filozofii v rámci marxismu-leninismu na UP. Po vylouèení z KSÈ v r. 1970 byl zbaven funkce øeditele a byla také pøerušena jeho spolupráce s vysokou školou. V 70. a 80. l. se vìnoval filozofii jen soukromì, v rukopise zùstaly nìkteré jeho pøeklady z nìmecké filozofie. Intenzivnì se v té dobì vìnoval dílu Jana Patoèky, o nìmž pozdìji napsal nìkolik studií, jež po r. 1990 vyšly v rùzných sbornících. Od r. 1990 pùsobil na obnovené katedøe filozofie na FF UP (pøednášel dìjiny antické filozofie); v r. 1993 se habilitoval a byl jmenován docentem. Ve svých studiích o Patoèkovi se zajímá hlavnì o jeho vztahy k nìkterým filozofickým osobnostem (zvl. k E. Husserlovi a T. G. Masarykovi), ale i o nìkteré problémy jeho filozofie, napø. o problém trojího pohybu nebo èeské národní filozofie. B. nehodnotí Patoèku jen jako žáka Husserlova, ale pokouší se u nìho najít i myšlenky, které u Husserla nebyly dostateènì tematizovány a které naopak Patoèka v návaznosti na Heideggera a Finka považoval za významné, napø. pojem existence pojaté jako trojí pohyb. Ve studii o osvícenství se B. dotýká i nìkterých otázek postmoderny, kterou nechápe jako pouhé zøeknutí se jednotného výkladu svìta, ale jako stav „mezi“, tj. jako zkoušení a hledání nových prostøedkù a postupù. Ve studii

62. Alphamusic - Plato And
    Translate this page Dienstag, den 11. Februar 2003. patocka, jan Lom, Petr Plato and Europe Buch StanfordUniversity Press VÖ-Datum 6/2001 Bestell-Nr. 0-8047-3801-7 21.83 EUR.  
    http://www.alpha-music.de/017/0804738017.html
    
    Extractions: unsere Produktdatenbank wird derzeit aktualisiert. Daher können wir Ihnen im Augenblick nicht das von Ihnen gesuchte Original-Produkt anzeigen, sondern stellen Ihnen interessante Auktionen zu Ihrem Suchbegriff vor. Melden Sie sich jetzt bei Ebay an und bieten Sie für diese interessanten Produkte mit. Ihr Alphamusic-Team Produkt Preis Gebote Endzeit Seth Bernadette: Socrates and Plato [dt-engl] EUR 1.00 Alle 1 Artikel bei eBay aufrufen Ausschlussklausel

63. IWM Fellowships
    jan patocka Junior Visiting Fellowship. Two fellowships are awarded annuallyin honor of the Czech philosopher jan patocka (19071977).  
    http://www.bu.edu/philo/money/iwm.html
    
    Extractions: T he (IWM) is accepting applications from doctoral and post-doctoral candidates from Europe and the United States for its Junior Visiting Fellowship Program. IWM is an intellectually and politically independent institute for advanced study supported by a community of scholars consisting of Permanent Fellows, Visiting Fellows and Junior Visiting Fellows. T he program gives promising young scholars in the humanities and social sciences an opportunity to pursue their research in Vienna under the guidance of IWM 's Permanent and Visiting Fellows. A pplications are especially encouraged from doctoral and post-doctoral candidates in Anthropology, Economics, International Relations, Modern History

64. Faculty Dodd
    activities include participation in an international translation and research projecton the contribution of the Czech philosopher jan patocka to understanding  
    http://www.bu.edu/philo/faculty/dodd.html
    
    Extractions: jamesdodd@compuserve.com (PhD, Boston University); Phenomenology, 19 th and 20 th Century Continental. Professor Dodd received his BA in Philosophy and Anthropology at Boston University in 1990, and his PhD in Philosophy at Boston University in 1996. In 1996-1997 he was a Fritz Thyssen Research Fellow at Bonn University in Germany, where he studied Kant's aesthetics and Schelling's philosophy of art. In 2000, Professor Dodd was an Alexander von Humboldt Fellow at the Husserl Archive (University of Cologne), where he pursued a research project on Husserl's logical writings. He has recently completed a book titled: Edmund Husserl's Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Interpretation, and Phenomenology and Logic: Investigations in Husserl's Later Writings. His Professional activities include participation in an international translation and research project on the contribution of the Czech philosopher Jan Patocka to understanding of the history of modernity. The project, Der andere Weg in die Moderne. Jan Patockas Beitrag zur Genealogie der Neuzeit

65. Www.soros.org/textfiles/speeches/042795_A_Failed_Philosopher_Tries_Again.txt
    jan patocka Memorial Lecture 1995 George Soros A Failed Philosopher Tries Again IntroductionThe 1995 IWM jan patocka Memorial Lecture George Soros A Failed  
    http://www.soros.org/textfiles/speeches/042795_A_Failed_Philosopher_Tries_Again.
    
    Extractions: Jan Patocka Memorial Lecture 1995 George Soros A Failed Philosopher Tries Again Introduction The 1995 IWM Jan Patocka Memorial Lecture George Soros: "A Failed Philosopher Tries Again" Delivered: 27 April 1995 Introduction: Krzysztof Michalski Krzysztof Michalski: Ladies and Gentleman: Ever since the year 1987, the Institute for Human Sciences has held the Patocka Memorial Lecture Series in order to commemorate Jan Patocka, who was an adept original philosopher, a co-founder of the Charter 77 and a wonderful human being. Jan Patocka died in 1977, after a long interrogation by the Czechoslovakian police. He was neither a hero, nor a revolutionary hero. Yet he believed that philosophy requires a binding commitment to human rights and a free society. He publicly defended them whenever he saw them endangered regardless of the consequences for his career and personal safety. I hope he will be remembered long and by many. Since its inception, the Institute for Human Sciences has tried to contribute to this, not only because some of the institute's founders, including myself, are indebted to Jan Patocka morally and intellectually, and not only because we have admired him as a person, but also because we have built and are building the institute on the same basic belief that serious scholarship and serious intellectual exchange requires solid commitment to freedom and an open society. So you will not be surprised that we have invited George Soros to give this evening's lecture. George Soros is a man who uses his enormous wealth to strengthen the cause of a free and open society by assisting efforts to build up and defend such a society, particularly in the countries of the former Soviet Empire, where Patocka originated. He is a man who is doing this not only out of moral consideration, but also on the basis of philosophical reflection. In particular, the strength of the philosophical foundations of his activities will be the topic of George Soros’ speech today. George Soros kindly accepted our invitation, although the institute could only offer him a modest fee. Thank you very much for this, George. Please take the stand... ============================================================== ================== George Soros: I am very honored to have been invited, and I did not know that I was getting a fee, but when I received an invitation from Michalski, I felt that the Institute for Human Sciences plays a very important role in bringing Eastern Europe into Europe, therefore, I felt that I really should support the Institute by coming. In addition, I felt that it would be a rather good occasion for me to form my philosophical beliefs here in Vienna, because in many ways, my philosophy takes off where logical positivism left off. In a way, by talking about my philosophy here, I have completed the Vienna circle, if you like. I am also pleased to have a great cathedral to speak from, because, in a way, this gives me a great occasion to announce the "doctrine of fallibility." "A Failed Philosopher Tries Again" My philosophy can be summed up in one phrase: a belief in our own fallibility, This phrase has the same significance for me as the dictum, cogito ergo sum, does for Descartes. Indeed, its significance is even greater: Descartes' dictum referred only to the person who thinks, whereas mine relates also to the world in which we live. The misconceptions and misunderstandings that go into our decisions help shape the events in which we participate. Fallibility plays the same role in human affairs as mutation does in biology. I need to emphasise that I am articulating a belief - a reasoned belief, to be sure, which is appropriate to a philosophy but still a belief - I cannot prove it, the way Descartes claimed to prove his own existence. God knows I tried and sometimes I came quite close to it, but in the end I always got caught in a web of my own weaving. There is something self-contradictory in being able to prove your own fallibility. Equally it is self-consistent that one should be unable to do now. So I am happy to assert the truth of my statement as a belief. This has an important implication. It implies that we need some belief to guide us through life. We cannot rely on reason alone. Rationality has its uses but it also has its limitations. What these limits are will be one of the questions I shall ask tonight. If we insist on staying within the limits of reason, we cannot cope with the world in which we live. By contrast, a belief in our own fallibility can take us much further. How much further will be the main question I shall explore tonight, although I must warn you that I will not have time to deal with the most important point, namely the connection between a belief in our fallibility and a belief in open society. That point will have to await another occasion. In my case, the belief in my own fallibility has guided me both in making money and in giving it away. But there is more to my existence than money, I focused on it in my career mainly because I recognised that there is a tendency in our society to exaggerate the importance of money, to define values in terns of money. We appraise artists by how much their creations fetch. We appraise politicians by the amount of money they can raise; often they appraise themselves by the mount of money they can make on the side. Having recognised the importance of making money, I may yet come to be recognised as a great philosopher - which would give me more satisfaction than the fortune I have made. The prevailing bias in favour of money and wealth is a good example of what I mean by fallibility. To translate the concept of fallibility into operational terms and to sharpen the point, I will assert that all our mental constructs with a few exceptions, are actually or potentially flawed. By mental constructs I mean the products of our thinking, whether they stay inside the recesses of our mind or find expression in the outside world in the form of institutions such as the financial markets or the varying exchange rate regimes or the United Nations, or the nation states, or the political and legal structure within states and between states. The mental constructs which stay within the confines of our mind can range all the way from simple sensory perceptions through language to elaborate belief systems which may or may not relate to the world in which we live. The best way to explain what I mean by flawed mental constructs is to examine the exceptions, mental constructs which are not flawed, we are capable of making statements which are either true or false. Such statements are not flawed. To the extent that we can rely on true statements, we are capable of attaining knowledge. It is only when they go beyond such "well formed" statements that our mental constructs are flawed. So we need to examine what kind of true statements we can make. There are singular statements which correspond to specific facts and there are rules by which the truth of some statements can be derived from other statements, notably in mathematics and logic. Our greatest achievement is science where we use rules to derive universally applicable generalisations from true singular statements. But as Karl Popper has shown, such generalisations cannot be verified, only falsified. They remain hypothetical in character, always subject to falsification. The common feature of all these forms of knowledge is that there are facts or rules which would serve as reliable criteria for judging their truth or validity if only we knew how to apply them. What makes the criteria reliable is that they are independent of the statements to which they are applied and of the people applying them. If you consider our position as human beings trying to understand the world in which we live, you will find that we cannot confine our thinking to subjects which are amenable to knowledge. We must make decisions about our lives and in order to do so we must hold views that do not qualify as knowledge, whether we recognise the difference or not. We must have recourse to beliefs. That is the human condition. Recognising the human condition does not quite qualify as knowledge - it would be self-contradictory if it did - but it provides a set of beliefs that is more appropriate to the human condition that any other - at least, that is what I believe when I assert my own fallibility. I find that my view of the world differs from the generally accepted wisdom In many ways, both large and small. Let me focus on the largest. The prevailing wisdom is heavily influenced by the phenomenal success of natural science. It seeks to imitate natural science In areas where it is not appropriate - notably human affairs. Natural science treats events as a succession of facts. In human affairs this treatment introduces a distortion because it diverts attention from the flaws in our mental constructs. It disregards the gap between the participants' views and the actual state of affairs. Nowhere is this bias more noticeable than in economic theory, but it also colors our interpretation of history. In events which have thinking participants, the chain of causation does not lead from one set of facts to the next; insofar as the participants' thinking plays a role, it leads from facts to perceptions, from perceptions to decisions and from decisions to the next set of facts. There is of course, also the direct link between one set of facts and the next which is characteristic of all natural phenomena. But this more circuitous link cannot be left out of account without introducing a distortion whenever there is a significant gap between perception and reality. Economic theory has managed to disregard the gap by taking demand and supply as given and focusing its attention on the relationship between supply and demand. It has construed an elaborate interpretation of reality which is, at least in one case, namely in the behaviour of financial markets, far removed from reality. By contrast I have focused on the gap between perception and reality. I notice that reality is reflected in people's thinking - I call this the cognitive function; and reality is affected by people's decisions - I call this the participating functions I notice further that the two functions work in opposite directions. In a narrow band they overlap. People think about events which are affected by their decisions. These events have a different structure from the events studied by natural science; they need to be thought about differently. I call these events reflexive. I contend that reflexivity introduces an element of uncertainty both into the participants thinking and the actual course of events. I have had considerable difficulties in developing my theory of reflexivity but I need not go into them here. The point I want to make is that in human affairs there is an element of uncertainty which is missing from natural phenomena . Natural science has also encountered uncertainty - notably in quantum physics. But the uncertainty I am talking about is different. It affects not only the subject matter but also the theories which relate to them. Heisenberg established the Uncertainty Principle and based on that principle quantum physics has been able to produce statistical generalisations which have significant predictive and explanatory powers. The Uncertainty Principle asserts that the observation of quantum phenomena affects their behaviour. But the Uncertainty Principle itself, or any other theory propounded by quantum physics does not affect the behavior of quantum phenomena; therefore those phenomena provide a reliable criterion for judging the validity of the theories. Suppose now that I proposed a theory which predicted the behavior of the stock market; surely it would affect the behavior of the stock market. This creates a different kind of uncertainty than the one which confronts quantum physics. It affects the criterion by which the truth of statements or the validity of theories is judged. That means that even a true theory may be false or a false theory may be true. How does that fit in with our generally accepted notion of truth? It seems that we need more than the two recognized categories, true and false, The logical positivists asserted that statements which are not true or false are meaningless. I thoroughly disagree. Theories that can affect the subject matter to which they refer are the opposite of meaningless. They can change the world. They express the active role that thinking can play in shaping reality. We need to adjust our concept of truth account for them. I propose that we need three categories: true, false and reflexive. The truth value of reflexive statements is indeterminate. It is possible to find other statements with an indeterminate truth value but we can live without them. We cannot live without reflexive statements. I hardly need to emphasise the profound significance of this proposition. Nothing is more fundamental to our thinking than our concept of truth. Logical positivism was a philosophy which celebrated the triumph of natural science. It carried the principles of natural science to their logical conclusion. I contend that it went too far. It suppressed the active role that thinking can play in shaping reality. Logical positivism serves as an example in demonstrating how far our view of the world has been shaped by natural science. We need to revise thoroughly our view of the world. That is what I hope to accomplish by my proposal to introduce a third category into our concept of truth: the reflexive. Let me give you an example of the difference that the recognition of the concept of reflexivity would make. There is now a widespread belief in the "magic of the 'market-place" which is based on the failure of government regulation. If you introduce the concept of reflexivity, it becomes apparent that the failure of regulation does not mean that free markets are perfect and vice versa. Both arrangements are flawed and the choice between them is reflexive. Reflexive statements lack an independent criterion for judging their truth. Their truth value is uncertain. Yet they are the opposite of meaningless. We cannot do without them in coping with the world in which we live, and they are not just passive reflections of what is; they actively construct our world. To be sure, there is a reality outside our thinking, a reality that we cannot bend to our will. But our thinking, our statements, are inside that reality, they form part of that reality. Somehow we have gained the impression that thinking and reality belong to separate but similar universes, and it is possible to establish a correspondence between then where the statements mirror the facts, This picture is appropriate to scientific method and to axiomatic systems like mathematics and logic, but not to us, living and thinking human beings. Karl Popper succeeded in showing how scientific method obeys the rules of deductive logic. His deductive nomological model of scientific method is brilliant in its simplicity. The model is composed of three kinds of statements: specific initial conditions, specific final conditions, and generalisations of universal applicability. Those three kinds of statements can be combined in three different ways: generalisations combined with initial conditions yield predictions; combined with final conditions, they provide explanations; and the combination of specific initial conditions with specific final conditions provides a test of the generalisations. The predictions and explanations are reversible, and generalisations are timeless. Reflexivity raises questions about the relevance of scientific method to the study of human and social phenomena. Popper maintained that the same methods and criteria apply to both social and natural science. He called this the doctrine of the unity of method. I have some doubts about this doctrine. I expressed them in the title of my books The Alchemy of Finance. I argued in the book that the expression "social science" is a false metaphor and events in which the participants' imperfect understanding plays a significant role cannot be explained and predicted by universally applicable laws. I now believe that I carried my arguments too far, just as the logical positivists did, only in the opposite direction. Abiding by the doctrine of the unity of methods it is possible to apply the methods and criteria of natural science to social phenomena and they may produce worthwhile results within their terms of reference. We must merely remember that their terms of reference exclude, by definition, events in which imperfect understanding plays a significant role. Economic theory, for instance, is valid as a hypothetical construct in which some of the consequences of imperfect understanding are assumed away. A distortion is created only when we apply the conclusion of economic theory to the real world. This is particularly noticeable in financial markets. The theory of rational expectations and efficient markets yields highly misleading results. One of the ways in which we cope with the uncertainties of the human condition is by carrying whatever knowledge, experience or insight we have gained to areas which it does not cover. This is true in visual perception, where we cover our blind spot without any difficulty as well as in the most complex constructs. In recent years, a new trend has emerged in natural science which is fundamentally different from the analytical approach described in Popper's model. This is the science of complexity, or evolutionary systems theory, or chaos theory as it is sometimes called. It studies open, evolutionary systems; it does not expect to produce deterministic predictions or explanations. All it seeks to do is to build models or run simulations. This has been made possible by the development of computer technology. I believe this approach is more relevant to the study of social phenomena than analytical science. But even here I find that the difference between social and natural phenomena is not sufficiently recognised. Most computer programs deal with the evolution of populations. To study the interaction between thinking and reality, we need a model of model-builders whose models in turn, must contain model-builders whose models, in turn, must contain model-builders, ad infinitum. To the best of my knowledge, this has not yet been done by any computer simulation. The infinite nesting of models must be brought to a close somewhere if the models are to serve any practical use. In any case, the models cannot reflect reality in its full complexity. That is another way to arrive at the conclusion that the participants' understanding is inherently imperfect. This is about as far as I can go in one lecture. I have given you the core ideas of my philosophy. I can only indicate where they have lead me in the real world. Once you recognise that there is a discrepancy between the participants views and the actual state of affairs, the discrepancy itself becomes a fertile field for study. There are situations where perceptions and reality are not too far apart and there are forces at work which tend to bring them closer together. I call this a state of dynamic equilibrium. There are other situations where perceptions and reality are quite far removed without any tendency to converge, I call these far- from-equilibrium conditions. There are cases of dynamic disequilibrium where both the real world and the participants' views are in flux and there are other cases where both the prevailing data and social reality are rigidly fixed but quite far apart out of quilter. I have specialised in far-from-equilibrium conditions, both in theory and in practice. I experienced them early in life as a Jewish boy of 14 under Nazi occupation in Hungary and then under Soviet occupation. I studied them in London and the ideas I formed under the influence of Karl Popper have guided me both in making money and in giving it away. I do not have time to explain how the belief in our fallibility leads to the concept of open Society as a goal worth fighting for, although that is the message I really want to deliver. As far as money-making is concerned, I would be better off keeping my ideas to myself. But to serve a useful purpose, it is not enough for me to believe in an open society. Open society will prevail only if people believe in it as a desirable goal. That is where the open societies of the West are failing today - you only need to look at Bosnia - and that is where I have failed so far, both as a philosopher and as an activist.

66. ISP/SOFI - Bertrand Bouckaert Publications
    Translate this page 598-623. – « jan patocka et la méthode phénoménologique. Denkwegemit Eugen Fink und jan patocka, Actes du colloque de Freiburg i/Br.  
    http://www.sofi.ucl.ac.be/cep/publbouckaert.html
    
    Extractions: Bertrand Bouckaert a. Articles Geistiger Verkehr et Recherches logiques , n° 25 (1997), pp. 77-104. Revue philosophique de Louvain , 96 (1998), pp. 598-623. , n° 29-30 (1998), pp. 75-87. Studia Europea , n° 7 (1999), pp. 43-55. L’eredita filosofica di Jan Patocka , Actes du colloque de Naples (5-7 juin 1997), D. Jervolino (ed.), Napoli, Cuen, 1999, pp. 39-50. , Louvain-la-Neuve, 2001, pp. 125-131. Recherches logiques Revue philosophique de Louvain, 99, 4 (2001), pp. 630-651. La philosophie allemande classique , in Revue philosophique de Louvain , 94 (1996), pp. 330-337. c. Recensions dans Revue philosophique de Louvain (RPL) , RPL, 92 (1994), pp. 602-604. Bolzano critique de Kant , RPL, 92 (1994), pp. 605-607. Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology , RPL, 93 (1995), pp. 199-200. , RPL, 93 (1995), pp. 439-441. Le monde de la vie. I. Dilthey et Husserl , RPL, 93 (1995), pp. 442-444. , RPL, 93 (1995), pp. 444-447. , RPL, 93 (1995), pp. 447-449. , RPL, 94 (1996), pp. 540-542.

67. UCL/SOFI - Études Phénoménologiques
    Translate this page contemporaine. Numéros parus. jan patocka (1985, n° 1). Henri jan patocka,phénoménologue et européen (1999, n° 29-30). Filip KARFIK  
    http://www.sofi.ucl.ac.be/CEP/cep2.html

68. A Failed Philosopher Tries Again - George Soros
    Introduction The 1995 IWM jan patocka Memorial Lecture jan patocka Memorial Lecture1995 Delivered 27 April 1995 Introduction Krzysztof Michalski Krzysztof  
    http://www.geocities.com/ecocorner/intelarea/gs7.html
    
    Extractions: Krzysztof Michalski: Ladies and Gentleman: Ever since the year 1987, the Institute for Human Sciences has held the Patocka Memorial Lecture Series in order to commemorate Jan Patocka, who was an adept original philosopher, a co-founder of the Charter 77 and a wonderful human being. Jan Patocka died in 1977, after a long interrogation by the Czechoslovakian police. He was neither a hero, nor a revolutionary hero. Yet he believed that philosophy requires a binding commitment to human rights and a free society. He publicly defended them whenever he saw them endangered regardless of the consequences for his career and personal safety. I hope he will be remembered long and by many. Since its inception, the Institute for Human Sciences has tried to contribute to this, not only because some of the institute's founders, including myself, are indebted to Jan Patocka morally and intellectually, and not only because we have admired him as a person, but also because we have built and are building the institute on the same basic belief that serious scholarship and serious intellectual exchange requires solid commitment to freedom and an open society. So you will not be surprised that we have invited George Soros to give this evening's lecture.

69. Patocka, Jan In Society > Philosophy > Philosophers
    Sites The Husserl Page jan patocka Bibliography. Extensive list of original writingsand translations. jan patocka Archive. S. earch. Find patocka, jan on  
    http://ilectric.com/browse/web/Society/Philosophy/Philosophers/Patocka,_Jan/
    
    Extractions: Metasearch Directory News Multi-Search ... Login/Out Choose a Search Metasearch - The Web Metasearch - This Site Metasearch - News Metasearch - Auctions Metasearch - Forums Metasearch - Images Metasearch - Shopping Directory - Within This Category Only Directory - Entire Directory - Adult Directory - Arts Directory - Business Directory - Computers Directory - Games Directory - Health Directory - Home Directory - News Directory - Recreation Directory - Reference Directory - Regional Directory - Science Directory - Shopping Directory - Society Directory - Sports Directory - World Shopping - All products Shopping - Books Shopping - Electronics Shopping - Popular music Shopping - Classical music Shopping - DVD's Shopping - VHS Videos Shopping - In Theaters Shopping - Toys Shopping - Computer Hardware Shopping - Software Shopping - Magazines Shopping - Photo Shopping - Garden / Outdoor Living Shopping - Baby Shopping - Kitchen Lookup - Domain in Whois Lookup - Domain Availability Lookup - HTTP Source Lookup - DNS Record Categories Related Sponsored Sites Sites ... Philosophers Patocka, Jan Books See all 33 results in Books...

70. Die Rezeption Des Philosophischen Werks Von Jan Patocka Im Deutschsprachigen Rau
    Translate this page Die Rezeption des philosophischen Werks von jan patocka im deutschsprachigen Raum.Ein Bericht. Beschlossen werden die Studien mit dem Beitrag jan patocka.  
    http://www.christian.rabanus.com/rezeptionsgeschichte.html
    
    Extractions: Die Rezeption des philosophischen Werks von Jan Patocka im deutschsprachigen Raum. Ein Bericht. Von Christian Rabanus, Wiesbaden. I. Die Rezeption des philosophischen Werks von Jan Patocka ist allgemein und speziell im deutschsprachigen Raum noch nicht weit entwickelt. Das Leben Jan Patockas vorzustellen Auf weitere Publikationen zu Patocka wird dann nur insofern eingegangen werden, als sie andere Themen von Patockas Philosophie als die im ersten Sammelband untersuchten behandeln oder in ihnen neue Gedanken zu den schon vorgestellten Themen entwickelt werden. II. unter dem Titel Studien zur Philosophie von Jan Patocka erschienen. Er beinhaltet neben einer kurzen Einleitung von Ernst Wolfgang Orth, Der Sozialphilosoph Ilja Srubar untersucht in seinem Beitrag eine Philosophie, die nur einen einzigen theoria ist. Der zweite Beitrag der Studien mit dem Titel Bemerkungen zu Jan Patockas Deutung der Kunst im April 1997 in Prag war daher ein wohlverdientes Zeichen der Anerkennung. Im Zentrum von Biemels Bemerkungen steht Patockas Aufsatz Kunst und Zeit Kunst und Zeit macht und ihn in die Lage versetzt, "die tiefere Bedeutung"

71. Tucker, The Philosophy And Politics Of Czech Dissidence From Patocka To Havel
    Czech presidents, Tomas Masaryk and Václav Havel, been serious philosophers in theirown right, but the pivotal work of the Socratic jan patocka animated the  
    http://www.pitt.edu/~press/2000/tucker.html
    
    Extractions: Aviezer Tucker Winner of the Foundations of Political Theory First Book Prize Honorable Mention, 2001 "Tucker unites a sympathetic knowledge of the phenomenological tradition with a sophisticated understanding of modern politics in general and of Czechoslovak and Czech politics in particular. He has a relentlessly commonsensical attitude towards the grand political claims that are often made in the Heideggerian tradition, yet does not dismiss Heideggerian philosophy or phenomenology as meaningless. . . . Straddles political philosophy, political theory, and analysis of political events."-Jon Elster, Columbia University "In this remarkable and complex case study of the relations between philosophy and politics, Aviezer Tucker examines the concept of dissidence and its role in the emergence of the post-Soviet Czech Republic. The Czech experience is of prime philosophical significance and deserves to be better known. Not only have two Czech presidents, Tomas Masaryk and Václav Havel, been serious philosophers in their own right, but the pivotal work of the Socratic Jan Patocka animated the challenge of the Charter 77 group and gave it phenomenological grounding and rationale as 'life in truth' . . . An impressively argued work, informative and rewarding."-Peter Caws, George Washington University

72. CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
    Translate this page 2. La phenomenologie de jan patocka. Coordination Renaud BARBARAS (Prof. Vendredi23 novembre R. BARBARAS (Clermont-Ferrand), La phenomenologie de jan patocka.  
    http://www.phenomenologycenter.org/newslinks/centrenational.htm
    
    Extractions: CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE - 45, rue d'Ulm, 75230 PARIS Cedex 05 UMR 8547 - Pays Germaniques: Histoire, Culture, Philosophie ARCHIVES-HUSSERL - Directeur: Jean-Francois COURTINE Seminaire 2001-02: Le mouvement phenomenologique 2. La phenomenologie de Jan Patocka Coordination Renaud BARBARAS (Prof. a l'Universite de Clermond-Ferrand) Date et lieu: vendredi de 17h à 19h, à l'Ecole Normale Superieure (46, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris) - salle des Conferences (sauf indication contraire) Calendrier: Vendredi 23 novembre: R. BARBARAS (Clermont-Ferrand), La phenomenologie de Jan Patocka. Vendredi 14 decembre: G. DENIAU (Nantes), Phenomenologie asubjective et hermeneutique - Patocka et Gadamer. Salle des Actes Vendredi 18 janvier: J.N. CUEILLE (Chartres), Mouvement, corps et existence chez Patocka. Salle Jules Ferry [29 rue d’Ulm] Vendredi 22 fevrier: B. BEGOUT (Amiens), La phenoménologie decapitee. Salle des Conferences [46 rue d’Ulm] Vendredi 22 mars: P. RODRIGO (Dijon), L'emergence du theme de l'asubjectivite. Salle des Acts [45 rue d’Ulm] Vendredi 12 avril: C. MAJOLINO (Rome), Le monde qui n'est pas la: le mathematique et le langage chez Patocka. Salle des Conferences [46 rue d’Ulm]

73. Filosofi Mars 2001
    institutions Lowe, EJ The possibility of metaphysics substance, identity, andtime patocka, jan An introduction to Husserl's phenomenology Hegel after  
    http://www.ub.ntnu.no/fakbib/dragvoll/filosofimars2001.htm

74. James Dodd - Philosophy At The Graduate Faculty Of Political And Social Science
    1995, jan patocka Visiting Fellowship (Institute for Human Sciences, Vienna). janpatockas Beitrag zur Genealogie der Neuzeit, jan patockaArchiv, Prague/Vienna.  
    http://www.newschool.edu/gf/phil/faculty/dodd/cv.htm
    
    Extractions: E-Mail: doddj@newschool.edu Education Ph.D., Philosophy, Boston University B.A., Anthropology and Philosophy, Summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, Boston University Academic Appointments Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Graduate Faculty, New School University GPH Husserl and Heidegger; LPH Philosophy and Tragedy Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Boston University PH 150 Introduction to Ethics; PH 160 Logic and Reasoning; PH 248 Existentialism; PH 300 History of Ancient Philosophy; PH 350 History of Ethics; PH 360 Symbolic Logic Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, Boston College

75. Suchmaschine Acoon - Webkatalog
    Translate this page Top Society Philosophy Philosophers patocka, jan jan patockaArchive at IWM, Vienna An archive of The Institute for Human  
    http://www.acoon.de/cgi-bin/showcat.exe?cat=Top/Society/Philosophy/Philosophers/

76. Mikulas Patocka - Re: GCC 3.3 For OS/2
    Re GCC 3.3 for OS/2. From Mikulas patocka mikulas at artax dot karlindot mff dot cuni dot cz ; To jan Hubicka jh at suse dot cz ;  
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg00424.html
    
    Extractions: This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project Index Nav: Date Index Subject Index Author Index Thread Index Message Nav: Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next Other format: Raw text Index Nav: Date Index Subject Index Author Index Thread Index Message Nav: Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next

77. DINO - Language: Englisch - Society - Philosophy - Philosophers - Patocka, Jan
    patocka, jan patocka, jan, Sprache/Language. Websites,  
    http://www.dino-online.de/dino_page_de55a124c783ca194137e09105e6869e.html

78. EconPapers: East Meets West: Richard Rorty And Jan Patocka On Freedom
    East Meets West Richard Rorty and jan patocka on Freedom. in EuropeanInstitute Political and Social Sciences from European Institute  
    http://econpapers.hhs.se/paper/ftheurops/97_2F13.htm
    
    Extractions: in European Institute - Political and Social Sciences from European Institute - Political and Social Sciences P. Lom Abstract: A Czech philosopher brought into dialogue with American postmodernism. Today, in current debates abobut liberalism, there is no consensus about how to defend or justify liberal principles for its traditional justifications. Keywords: LIBERALISM PHILOSOPHY (search for similar items in EconPapers)

79. Dynamic Directory - Society - Philosophy - Philosophers - Patocka, Jan
    MaximumEdge.com Search EMail News Weather Finance Directory Lottery Results Horoscopes Translation Games E-Cards Maps Dynamic Directory ©1999-2003. All rights reserved. Contact Part of the  
    http://www.maximumedge.com/cgi/dir/index.cgi/Society/Philosophy/Philosophers/Pat

80. Katalog - Wirtualna Polska
    Serwis Katalog w Wirtualna Polska S.A. pierwszy portal w Polsce.  
    http://katalog.wp.pl/DMOZ/Society/Philosophy/Philosophers/Patocka%2C_Jan

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

61-80 of 90    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20